Advertising disclosure — We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded. Order reflects our editorial rubric and our commercial relationships; scores are ours alone.
Head-to-head for women
Curex vs Eden
Curex and Eden both offer GLP-1 telehealth to women, but they make different trade-offs on PCOS and hormonal suitability, clinical oversight, price and access. Here they are side-by-side on the Luna Fit Score — our women's-health rubric.
Curex
Ranked #36 for women · Grade B
Luna Fit
Best for: Women who want the freedom to choose or switch molecules at one flat price, with an oral option and accreditation.
FDA warning letterSeptember 2025Read it ↗Visit CurexEden
Higher scoreRanked #3 for women · Grade B+
Luna Fit
Best for: Women who value knowing exactly who is prescribing and where the medication comes from, and will pay above the cheapest tiers for that transparency.
FDA warning letterJune 2026Read it ↗Visit EdenThe verdict for women
Eden edges out Curex on the Luna Fit Score, 88 to 84 (B+ vs B). Women who value knowing exactly who is prescribing and where the medication comes from, and will pay above the cheapest tiers for that transparency. The reasoning behind that number is in our Eden write-up for women.
Curex is still a genuine option — identical pricing on both molecules plus an oral option from an accredited platform — appealing if you want to switch between semaglutide and tirzepatide without a price penalty. Weigh the six women's-health factors below against your own priorities; what we found reviewing Curex goes through each of them, and if neither of these two is the one, the full field we rank against Curex widens the field.
Side-by-side on the six factors
Both providers scored on the same women's-health rubric — the higher side on each factor is marked. See the methodology.
Price, access & features
| Detail | Curex | Eden |
|---|---|---|
| Luna Fit Score | 84/100 · B | 88/100 · B+ |
| Overall rank | #36 | #3 |
| Semaglutide | $199/mo | $239/mo |
| Tirzepatide | $199/mo | $349/mo |
| Coverage | All 50 states | All 50 states |
| Brand-name access | Compounded only | Compounded only |
| Oral / sublingual | Yes | Injection only |
Luna Fit
Curex
Ranked #36 · Grade B
What we like
- Same price for semaglutide and tirzepatide — no penalty for choosing the molecule that suits insulin-resistant PCOS
- Offers an oral/sublingual form
- LegitScript-accredited and nationwide
The caveats
- Mid-market pricing rather than budget
- No FDA-approved brand access; general program
Luna Fit
Eden
Ranked #3 · Grade B+
What we like
- Clear clinician and supply-chain disclosure — among the most transparent in the ranking about who and what is behind the prescription
- Nationwide availability with both molecules
- High verification confidence: the facts it publishes hold up when checked
The caveats
- Premium pricing versus the cheapest tiers
- Compounded only — no brand-name access
- Not a hormone-specialty clinic; PCOS framing is general
Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; the Luna Fit Score is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.
More head-to-heads
Neither Curex nor Eden is only worth comparing with the other. Curex is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 9 points apart on the Luna Fit Score — see Curex vs CoreAge Rx for women. Eden is also written up against Ondra Health, another exact tie — see the Eden–Ondra Health head-to-head.
- Curex vs CoreAge Rx
- Curex vs Enhance MD
- Curex vs yourEra
- Eden vs Sesame Care
- Eden vs HealthRX
- Eden vs MadeMed
Or browse the full comparison hub.