Advertising disclosure — We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded. Order reflects our editorial rubric and our commercial relationships; scores are ours alone.
Head-to-head for women
MyDrHank vs RX Bella
MyDrHank and RX Bella both offer GLP-1 telehealth to women, but they make different trade-offs on PCOS and hormonal suitability, clinical oversight, price and access. Here they are side-by-side on the Luna Fit Score — our women's-health rubric.
MyDrHank
Higher scoreRanked #50 for women · Grade C
Luna Fit
Best for: Readers treating insulin resistance who want tirzepatide at a price that does not climb with the dose, and who will open the plan selector and pay the month-to-month rate rather than the advertised one.
Visit MyDrHankRX Bella
Ranked #78 for women · Grade C
Luna Fit
Best for: A woman weighing a microdose against a full dose who will get a firm figure in writing before handing over an email address.
Visit RX BellaThe verdict for women
MyDrHank edges out RX Bella on the Luna Fit Score, 73 to 65 (C vs C). Readers treating insulin resistance who want tirzepatide at a price that does not climb with the dose, and who will open the plan selector and pay the month-to-month rate rather than the advertised one. The reasoning behind that number is in our MyDrHank write-up for women.
RX Bella is still a genuine option — four routes on one page, a hero quoting the cheapest of them, and treatment pages that carry no price at all. Weigh the six women's-health factors below against your own priorities; what we found reviewing RX Bella goes through each of them, and if neither of these two is the one, the full field we rank against RX Bella widens the field.
Side-by-side on the six factors
Both providers scored on the same women's-health rubric — the higher side on each factor is marked. See the methodology.
Price, access & features
| Detail | MyDrHank | RX Bella |
|---|---|---|
| Luna Fit Score | 73/100 · C | 65/100 · C |
| Overall rank | #50 | #78 |
| Semaglutide | $259/mo month-to-month (from $178/mo on a 12-month prepay, $2,140 up front) — the site displays only the prepay rate | From $249/mo — a floor the company never resolves into a rate |
| Tirzepatide | $349/mo month-to-month (from $240/mo on a 12-month prepay, $2,883 up front) — the site displays only the prepay rate | From $299/mo — the same floor treatment |
| Coverage | No state list published; its affiliate terms exclude Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Dakota and West Virginia | Nationwide telehealth, claimed but not enumerated |
| Brand-name access | Compounded only | Compounded only |
| Oral / sublingual | Yes | Yes |
Luna Fit
MyDrHank
Ranked #50 · Grade C
What we like
- Tirzepatide is a first-class option here, not an upsell — the dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist is the one most readers arriving on insulin-resistance questions ask about by name
- The price does not move with the dose: its GLP-1 FAQ states "the price stays the same at every dose — no surprise price increases", so a titration to a higher dose does not re-price the plan
- Prices are published before any intake quiz — the full four-rung ladder for every product, with the up-front total beside each per-month figure, rather than a number you have to qualify for
The caveats
- Every price the site displays is the TWELVE-MONTH PREPAY rate — the renderer takes the cheapest rung of the ladder — so the month-to-month figures ($349 tirzepatide, $259 semaglutide) are shown on no page at all
- Its own footnote advertises a tirzepatide price that exists at no tier: "Plans start at $171/mo for compounded semaglutide and $200/mo for compounded tirzepatide" — $200 appears exactly once in the entire site bundle and no tirzepatide rung costs it; the $171 in the same sentence is the ORAL product's yearly rate, while injectable semaglutide's is $178
- The GLP-1 FAQ calls a prepaid annual rate a plan with "no contract", which is true of the paperwork and misleading about the money
Luna Fit
RX Bella
Ranked #78 · Grade C
What we like
- Four routes are priced on one page before any intake: microdose, oral, semaglutide injection and tirzepatide injection
- Nothing in the catalog is struck through — no invented "was" price and no expiring offer
- "$0 if you're not approved" is stated plainly and repeatedly
The caveats
- The hero's "from $199/mo" is the microdose, not either injection; tirzepatide is $299
- Every figure is a floor with no dose ladder, and the eight-screen intake reaches an email gate without showing a price
- Its own treatment pages carry no dollar figure and read "AVAILABLE BY CONSULTATION"
Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; the Luna Fit Score is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.
More head-to-heads
Neither MyDrHank nor RX Bella is only worth comparing with the other. MyDrHank is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 20 points apart on the Luna Fit Score — see MyDrHank against CoreAge Rx, factor by factor. RX Bella is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 28 points apart — see how RX Bella and CoreAge Rx compare on the Luna Fit Score.
- MyDrHank vs CoreAge Rx
- MyDrHank vs Enhance MD
- MyDrHank vs Eden
- RX Bella vs yourEra
- RX Bella vs Sesame Care
- RX Bella vs HealthRX
Or browse the full comparison hub.