Advertising disclosure — We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded. Order reflects our editorial rubric and our commercial relationships; scores are ours alone.
Head-to-head for women
Curex vs Edessa
Curex and Edessa both offer GLP-1 telehealth to women, but they make different trade-offs on PCOS and hormonal suitability, clinical oversight, price and access. Here they are side-by-side on the Luna Fit Score — our women's-health rubric.
Curex
Higher scoreRanked #36 for women · Grade B
Luna Fit
Best for: Women who want the freedom to choose or switch molecules at one flat price, with an oral option and accreditation.
FDA warning letterSeptember 2025Read it ↗Visit CurexEdessa
Ranked #74 for women · Grade C
Luna Fit
Best for: A woman prepared to prepay six months, or one willing to click past the front page to the table carrying the real monthly rate.
Visit EdessaThe verdict for women
Curex edges out Edessa on the Luna Fit Score, 84 to 69 (B vs C). Women who want the freedom to choose or switch molecules at one flat price, with an oral option and accreditation. The reasoning behind that number is in what we found reviewing Curex.
Edessa is still a genuine option — clean three-rung tables one click in, behind a front page whose three cards all quote six-month rungs and whose cheapest belongs to a different drug. Weigh the six women's-health factors below against your own priorities; what we found reviewing Edessa goes through each of them, and if neither of these two is the one, what women pick instead of Edessa widens the field.
Side-by-side on the six factors
Both providers scored on the same women's-health rubric — the higher side on each factor is marked. See the methodology.
Price, access & features
| Detail | Curex | Edessa |
|---|---|---|
| Luna Fit Score | 84/100 · B | 69/100 · C |
| Overall rank | #36 | #74 |
| Semaglutide | $199/mo | $179/mo month-to-month for the injection ($135 only on a six-month prepay) |
| Tirzepatide | $199/mo | $239/mo month-to-month ($209 only on a six-month prepay) |
| Coverage | All 50 states | Not publicly listed |
| Brand-name access | Compounded only | Compounded only |
| Oral / sublingual | Yes | Yes |
Luna Fit
Curex
Ranked #36 · Grade B
What we like
- Same price for semaglutide and tirzepatide — no penalty for choosing the molecule that suits insulin-resistant PCOS
- Offers an oral/sublingual form
- LegitScript-accredited and nationwide
The caveats
- Mid-market pricing rather than budget
- No FDA-approved brand access; general program
Luna Fit
Edessa
Ranked #74 · Grade C
What we like
- Each product page carries a plain three-rung table, so the commitment behind every figure is visible
- "Same price, every dose" is printed on each product page
- Names its operating entity and a full street address in Las Vegas, Nevada
The caveats
- The front page leads with "Start for just $135", a six-month prepay on the semaglutide injection; month-to-month tirzepatide is $239
- All three front-page cards quote the six-month rung, so the real monthly rates appear only after a click
- Its Terms give two corporate forms for the same company in one clause — "Edessa Group, LLC, a Nevada corporation"
Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; the Luna Fit Score is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.
More head-to-heads
Neither Curex nor Edessa is only worth comparing with the other. Curex is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 9 points apart on the Luna Fit Score — see Curex vs CoreAge Rx for women. Edessa is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 24 points apart — see how Edessa and CoreAge Rx compare on the Luna Fit Score.
- Curex vs CoreAge Rx
- Curex vs Enhance MD
- Curex vs Eden
- Edessa vs yourEra
- Edessa vs Sesame Care
- Edessa vs HealthRX
Or browse the full comparison hub.