Advertising disclosure — We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded. Order reflects our editorial rubric and our commercial relationships; scores are ours alone.
Head-to-head for women
HealthRX vs Science & Co
HealthRX and Science & Co both offer GLP-1 telehealth to women, but they make different trade-offs on PCOS and hormonal suitability, clinical oversight, price and access. Here they are side-by-side on the Luna Fit Score — our women's-health rubric.
HealthRX
Higher scoreRanked #6 for women · Grade B
Luna Fit
Best for: Women who want a LegitScript-certified, physician-supervised program with both molecules, an oral-tablet route as well as injections, and transparent flat pricing with no insurance to navigate.
Visit HealthRXScience & Co
Ranked #64 for women · Grade C
Luna Fit
Best for: A woman ready to commit twelve months, or one who values a company stating plainly what it is and what it is not.
Visit Science & CoThe verdict for women
HealthRX edges out Science & Co on the Luna Fit Score, 85 to 74 (B vs C). Women who want a LegitScript-certified, physician-supervised program with both molecules, an oral-tablet route as well as injections, and transparent flat pricing with no insurance to navigate. The reasoning behind that number is in the HealthRX scorecard.
Science & Co is still a genuine option — declares in its own footer that it is not a compounding facility, and explains its own asterisk in its own FAQ — two disclosures almost nothing else here makes. Weigh the six women's-health factors below against your own priorities; our full Science & Co review goes through each of them, and if neither of these two is the one, the alternatives to Science & Co we rank for women widens the field.
Side-by-side on the six factors
Both providers scored on the same women's-health rubric — the higher side on each factor is marked. See the methodology.
Price, access & features
| Detail | HealthRX | Science & Co |
|---|---|---|
| Luna Fit Score | 85/100 · B | 74/100 · C |
| Overall rank | #6 | #64 |
| Semaglutide | $190/mo month-to-month ($99 first month, renews at $165) · $99/mo on a 12-month prepay ($1,188) | $149/mo month-to-month ($79 only on a twelve-month plan) |
| Tirzepatide | $239/mo month-to-month ($149 first month, renews at $214) · $179/mo on a 12-month prepay ($2,148) | $199/mo month-to-month ($125 only on a twelve-month plan) |
| Coverage | Not publicly listed | Not publicly listed |
| Brand-name access | Yes | Compounded only |
| Oral / sublingual | Yes | Injection only |
Luna Fit
HealthRX
Ranked #6 · Grade B
What we like
- LegitScript-certified (a meaningful third-party trust signal) with physician-supervised care, not a prescription-only handoff
- Both molecules plus a rare oral GLP-1 tablet — real optionality for the needle-averse and for insulin-resistant PCOS
- Transparent, no-insurance flat pricing — injectable GLP-1 around $189/mo, oral tablet around $239/mo, GLP+GIP around $349/mo
The caveats
- Compounded medication is not FDA-approved the way brand Ozempic, Wegovy, or Zepbound are
- Some tiers are company-stated and the public site is thin, so a few figures can't be verified live
- Brand-name tiers are pass-through and expensive — brand Ozempic runs about $1,299/mo
Luna Fit
Science & Co
Ranked #64 · Grade C
What we like
- States twice in its footer that "Science and Co, Inc. is not a 503A or 503B compounding facility"
- Its own FAQ names the commitment behind the headline: "Plans start at $79 a month on the 12 month plan"
- The printed saving corroborates the reference price — 79 divided by 149 is 53%, exactly the "Save 47%" shown
The caveats
- The number it leads with is a twelve-month commitment; the per-month rates are $149 and $199
- Only two figures are published per drug, so a three- or six-month plan cannot be priced without starting an intake
- It says it is not a compounding facility but never names the pharmacy that is
Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; the Luna Fit Score is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.
More head-to-heads
Neither HealthRX nor Science & Co is only worth comparing with the other. HealthRX is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 8 points apart on the Luna Fit Score — see the HealthRX–CoreAge Rx head-to-head. Science & Co is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 19 points apart — see Science & Co vs CoreAge Rx for women.
- HealthRX vs CoreAge Rx
- HealthRX vs Enhance MD
- HealthRX vs Eden
- Science & Co vs yourEra
- Science & Co vs Sesame Care
- Science & Co vs MadeMed
Or browse the full comparison hub.