Skip to content
Luna Metabolic
Menu

Advertising disclosure We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded. Order reflects our editorial rubric and our commercial relationships; scores are ours alone.

Ranked #64 for women · Grade C

Science & Co review

Declares in its own footer that it is not a compounding facility, and explains its own asterisk in its own FAQ — two disclosures almost nothing else here makes.

Visit Science & Co Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. See our disclosure.
Semaglutide
$149/mo month-to-month ($79 only on a twelve-month plan)
Tirzepatide
$199/mo month-to-month ($125 only on a twelve-month plan)
Coverage
Not publicly listed
Brand-name
Compounded only

The Luna Fit scorecard

Science & Co scored on our six women's-health factors. See the methodology.

PCOS & hormonal suitability72/100
Clinical oversight & labs74/100
Price transparency72/100
Nationwide access62/100
Ongoing support86/100
Cancellation fairness82/100

What we like

  • States twice in its footer that "Science and Co, Inc. is not a 503A or 503B compounding facility"
  • Its own FAQ names the commitment behind the headline: "Plans start at $79 a month on the 12 month plan"
  • The printed saving corroborates the reference price — 79 divided by 149 is 53%, exactly the "Save 47%" shown
  • "Same Price, Any Dose", with no hidden fees, no monthly membership and free shipping stated in the FAQ
  • 24/7 care-team messaging, and every batch described as third-party tested for purity and potency

The caveats

  • The number it leads with is a twelve-month commitment; the per-month rates are $149 and $199
  • Only two figures are published per drug, so a three- or six-month plan cannot be priced without starting an intake
  • It says it is not a compounding facility but never names the pharmacy that is
  • No lab protocol is published, and nothing addresses PCOS or the perimenopause transition

The bottom line

Best for: A woman ready to commit twelve months, or one who values a company stating plainly what it is and what it is not. Declares in its own footer that it is not a compounding facility, and explains its own asterisk in its own FAQ — two disclosures almost nothing else here makes.

Ranked #64 of 80 providers we reviewed for women — see our #1 pick, CoreAge Rx, for comparison. Nationwide access is where Science & Co scores lowest, at 62/100. If that is your sticking point, start with what women pick instead of Science & Co.

Others in Science & Co's score range

The providers scoring closest to Science & Co on the same six factors. One of those comparisons is written out in full: Science & Co vs CoreAge Rx for women, 19 points apart on the Luna Fit Score. Directly below Science & Co sits NEUVÉ Health at #65 with 74/100 — see our ranked shortlist of NEUVÉ Health alternatives if that is the band you are shopping in.

See all 80 providers we've reviewed for women — ranked on the same rubric, with scores and pricing side by side.

Pricing, states and verification reflect Science & Co's public disclosures at last review; the Luna Fit Score is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on Science & Co's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to all providers