Advertising disclosure — We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. How we're funded. Order reflects our editorial rubric and our commercial relationships; scores are ours alone.
Head-to-head for women
Peter MD vs Science & Co
Peter MD and Science & Co both offer GLP-1 telehealth to women, but they make different trade-offs on PCOS and hormonal suitability, clinical oversight, price and access. Here they are side-by-side on the Luna Fit Score — our women's-health rubric.
Peter MD
Ranked #53 for women · Grade C
Luna Fit
Best for: Someone who wants tirzepatide or compounded semaglutide alongside TRT, NAD+, sermorelin or hair-loss care on one login, and doesn't need a women's-hormone-specialized program to get it.
Visit Peter MDScience & Co
Higher scoreRanked #64 for women · Grade C
Luna Fit
Best for: A woman ready to commit twelve months, or one who values a company stating plainly what it is and what it is not.
Visit Science & CoThe verdict for women
Science & Co edges out Peter MD on the Luna Fit Score, 74 to 72 (C vs C). A woman ready to commit twelve months, or one who values a company stating plainly what it is and what it is not. The reasoning behind that number is in our full Science & Co review.
Peter MD is still a genuine option — a physician-prescribed telehealth brand (Miami, founded 2021) that puts GLP-1 care on the same account as TRT, ED, NAD+, sermorelin and hair loss — genuinely broad, but built for a general and largely male-first audience rather than PCOS or hormonal care specific to women. Weigh the six women's-health factors below against your own priorities; our Peter MD write-up for women goes through each of them, and if neither of these two is the one, what women pick instead of Peter MD widens the field.
Side-by-side on the six factors
Both providers scored on the same women's-health rubric — the higher side on each factor is marked. See the methodology.
Price, access & features
| Detail | Peter MD | Science & Co |
|---|---|---|
| Luna Fit Score | 72/100 · C | 74/100 · C |
| Overall rank | #53 | #64 |
| Semaglutide | $149/mo (Level 1, new patients; $447 total for a 10-12 wk supply) or $139/mo (Level 2, returning; $834 total for an 8-12 wk supply) — compounded semaglutide + B12 | $149/mo month-to-month ($79 only on a twelve-month plan) |
| Tirzepatide | $249/mo billed quarterly ($149 first month), 60mg dose | $199/mo month-to-month ($125 only on a twelve-month plan) |
| Coverage | Restrictions vary by treatment — several states excluded | Not publicly listed |
| Brand-name access | Compounded only | Compounded only |
| Oral / sublingual | Injection only | Injection only |
Luna Fit
Peter MD
Ranked #53 · Grade C
What we like
- One of the widest catalogs in this ranking: TRT, ED, weight loss, GLP-1, men's hair loss and NAD+ all live under a single account
- Physician-prescribed rather than a form-only handoff
- Both GLP-1 molecules disclosed with real per-product pricing, not a single vague headline figure
The caveats
- Price varies meaningfully by tier and product — semaglutide alone has two published rates (new vs. returning patient) whose totals don't cleanly reduce to one monthly number
- Tirzepatide is billed quarterly with a first-month teaser rate ($149) against a $249/mo standing charge — budget for the standing rate, not the number in the hero
- State restrictions vary by treatment and are broader than the customer-facing pages disclose — the affiliate program's own listing excludes several more states (AL, AR, CA, ID, IA, KY, LA, MA, MI, NC, SC, TX depending on the product) than the marketing pages mention
Luna Fit
Science & Co
Ranked #64 · Grade C
What we like
- States twice in its footer that "Science and Co, Inc. is not a 503A or 503B compounding facility"
- Its own FAQ names the commitment behind the headline: "Plans start at $79 a month on the 12 month plan"
- The printed saving corroborates the reference price — 79 divided by 149 is 53%, exactly the "Save 47%" shown
The caveats
- The number it leads with is a twelve-month commitment; the per-month rates are $149 and $199
- Only two figures are published per drug, so a three- or six-month plan cannot be priced without starting an intake
- It says it is not a compounding facility but never names the pharmacy that is
Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; the Luna Fit Score is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.
More head-to-heads
Neither Peter MD nor Science & Co is only worth comparing with the other. Peter MD is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 21 points apart on the Luna Fit Score — see Peter MD against CoreAge Rx, factor by factor. Science & Co is also written up against CoreAge Rx, 19 points apart — see Science & Co vs CoreAge Rx for women.
- Peter MD vs CoreAge Rx
- Peter MD vs Enhance MD
- Peter MD vs Eden
- Science & Co vs yourEra
- Science & Co vs Sesame Care
- Science & Co vs HealthRX
Or browse the full comparison hub.